Colorado Supreme Court Rules Against Trump’s Candidacy in 2024 Presidential Primary
Landmark decision based on constitutional grounds bars former President from Colorado’s primary ballot
In a groundbreaking ruling, the Colorado Supreme Court has determined that former President Donald Trump’s candidacy in the state’s primary next year is prohibited under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This decision, which marks the first of its kind, follows a lawsuit that challenged a little-known provision of the Constitution. While similar challenges in other states have failed, the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling sets a precedent that could have far-reaching implications for future elections.
The Constitutional Basis for the Ruling
The Colorado Supreme Court’s decision is rooted in Section Three of the 14th Amendment, which states that individuals who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States are disqualified from holding office. The court determined that Trump’s actions leading up to the January 6th Capitol riot constituted incitement of violence and lawlessness, thus falling within the scope of the constitutional provision. The majority of the court agreed with the lower court’s finding that Trump had engaged in insurrection, rejecting the argument that presidents are exempt from Section Three.
Implications for the Colorado Primary
As a result of the ruling, Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold is prohibited from listing Trump as a candidate on the 2024 presidential primary ballot. Furthermore, any write-in votes cast for Trump will not be counted. However, the court has put its decision on hold until January 4th, allowing for further appeals. If the matter reaches the U.S. Supreme Court before that date, the pause will remain in effect, and Colorado will be required to include Trump’s name on the primary ballot pending action by the higher court.
Reactions and Appeal Plans
Trump’s campaign spokesperson, Steven Cheung, criticized the ruling, accusing the Colorado Supreme Court of supporting a left-wing group’s attempt to interfere in the election. Cheung expressed confidence in an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, stating that they expect a favorable ruling. Trump’s personal lawyer, Alina Habba, condemned the decision, calling it an attack on the nation’s democracy and expressing trust in the Supreme Court to reverse the ruling.
Historical Significance and Uncharted Territory
The Colorado Supreme Court acknowledged the weight of its decision, recognizing that it treads in uncharted territory. The ruling sets a historic precedent by disqualifying a former president from running in a primary election based on constitutional grounds. The court emphasized its duty to apply the law without fear or favor, regardless of public opinion.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington’s Role
The lawsuit challenging Trump’s candidacy was filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), a left-leaning government watchdog group. Noah Bookbinder, the president of CREW, hailed the ruling as necessary to protect the future of democracy in the country. He argued that the Constitution bars those who attack democracy from serving in government, and the court’s decision aligns with this principle.
Conclusion: The Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling against Donald Trump’s candidacy in the state’s 2024 presidential primary has significant implications for future elections. Based on the constitutional provision in the 14th Amendment, the court determined that Trump’s actions leading up to the Capitol riot constituted insurrection, disqualifying him from holding office. While the ruling is currently on hold, pending further appeals, it sets a historic precedent and raises important questions about the application of constitutional provisions in the electoral process. As the legal battle continues, the outcome will shape the future of primary elections and the eligibility of candidates.